Environmental Impacts of Different Levels of Diapers Absorbents on the Physical Fertility Status of a Typical Sandy Soil

Tangban Eji Ejor; Aboh Andrew Ashieta; Udama Phidel Ichuware; Ovat Innocent Ovat1

1

Publication Date: 2024/12/02

Abstract: The increasing prevalence of disposable diapers poses significant environmental challenges, particularly concerning their impact on soil health through improper disposal. This study investigates the effects of varying levels of diaper absorbents on the physical fertility status of a typical sandy soil, characterized by its low nutrient retention and water-holding capabilities. We conducted a controlled experiment at the Teaching and Research Farm of the University of Cross River State, Nigeria, examining six treatments with different concentrations of diaper absorbents (0g, 40g, 80g, 120g, 160g, and 200g per 10kg of soil). Key soil parameters, including pH, bulk density, total porosity, degree of saturation, and available moisture holding capacity, were analyzed over four weeks. Results indicated a significant decrease in soil pH with increasing absorbent levels, suggesting enhanced soil acidity linked to microbial activity and organic acid release. The degree of saturation increased from 12.20% in the zero absorbent treatment to 58.03% in the 200g treatment, indicating improved water retention capabilities. Additionally, bulk density decreased from 1.30 g/cm3 to 0.86 g/cm3, and total porosity increased from 51.09% to 67.42%, reflecting better soil structure and aeration with higher absorbent levels. These findings underscore the potential of diaper absorbents to modify key physical properties of sandy soils, with implications for agricultural practices and waste management strategies. Understanding these interactions is crucial for developing sustainable approaches to mitigate the environmental impacts associated with diaper disposal while preserving soil fertility and ecosystem health.

Keywords: No Keywords Available

DOI: https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV851

PDF: https://ijirst.demo4.arinfotech.co/assets/upload/files/IJISRT24NOV851.pdf

REFERENCES

  1. Blake, G. R (1965) Bulk density. In methods of soil analysis, pp. 374-390. American society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
  2. Danielson, R. E., and Sutherland, P. L. (1986) Porosity in: Klute A., (ED) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison Wisconsin. 443-461.
  3. Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2016). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
  4. Hillel, D. (1982). Introduction to soil Physics. Academic press Inc. London Ltd. Pp. 365.
  5. Hillel, D. (2004). Soil and Water: Physical Principles and Processes. Academic Press.
  6. Jones, A., Smith, B., & Johnson, C. (2019). Soil Testing Procedures for Nutrient Content and Composition. Soil Science Journal, 34(2), 115-123.
  7. Lehmann, J., & Rillig, M. C. (2015). Biochar effects on soil nutrient availability. In Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation (pp. 95-112). Routledge.
  8. Miller, J. R., & Tschaplinski, T. J. (2020). Environmental impacts of disposable diapers: A review. Waste Management, 102, 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.014.
  9. Phogat, V. K., Tomar, V. S.  and Dahiya, R. (2015). Soil physical properties. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297737054. pp. 134-171.
  10. R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/
  11. Smith, D., Brown, E., & Lee, F. (2020). Methods for Analyzing Soil Physical Properties. Advances in Soil Science, 45(3), 200-215