Authors :
Aashana Chandak
Volume/Issue :
Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
http://bitly.ws/9nMw
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/2PT9yNS
DOI :
10.38124/IJISRT20JUL858
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Browse-wrap agreements are e-contracts
that lack the element of express consent which creates
ambiguity in their enforcement across countries like
India and Canada. The United States of America has
through a plethora of case laws attempted to follow a
framework with a adequate communication of notice
system which is subjected to consumer protection
concerns. With the recent enforcement of the General
Data Protection Regulations(GDPR)in the European
Union it has led to the complete abandonment of the
browse-wrap agreements due to the lack of the
consentbeing explicitly provided. Leading to the rise in
the recognition of theclick-wrap agreements being
adopted as a standardized form of e-commerce
contracts across jurisdictions
Browse-wrap agreements are e-contracts
that lack the element of express consent which creates
ambiguity in their enforcement across countries like
India and Canada. The United States of America has
through a plethora of case laws attempted to follow a
framework with a adequate communication of notice
system which is subjected to consumer protection
concerns. With the recent enforcement of the General
Data Protection Regulations(GDPR)in the European
Union it has led to the complete abandonment of the
browse-wrap agreements due to the lack of the
consentbeing explicitly provided. Leading to the rise in
the recognition of theclick-wrap agreements being
adopted as a standardized form of e-commerce
contracts across jurisdictions